Thursday, June 3, 2010

Class Still Exists...In Some Places

I'm not much of a baseball fan.  Never have been, never will be.  For one thing, I find the game boring.  It also drives me nuts how these guys go on the injured reserve list for 15 days because of a sore pinky toe while pulling down $50 million a year.  Excuse me?  If you're being paid that much money to perform at a professional level, I think you can gut through the *ahem* pain.

Nevertheless, this week saw a moment in baseball that is something we should all acknowledge as the epitome of class:

Last night Armando Galarraga did everything perfect in a baseball game between Detroit and Cleveland. Nine innings, "twenty-seven outs", no runs, no hits, and no walks. The only problem was umpire Jim Joyce missed the call on the last out. To be honest, the call was close, but I've seen closer calls made correctly. Joyce, a veteran umpire just simply made the wrong call, and what should have been the third perfect game (this season), finished with a 3-0 Detroit victory and a "one hit" shout-out. 

While sportswriters and the news media will tell the story of the one that got away, and all the reasons why more instant re-play should be instituted into the game, I think the real story is about how both professionals handled the "event". To the enormous credit of both the umpire and player, it was the class and sportsmanship that followed after the game that should be remembered. 

Rarely does a veteran umpire personally apologize to a player for his errors. Jim Joyce took his "mistake" to a higher level by letting Galarraga know just how sorry he was:

 Tigers general manager Dave Dombrowski said Joyce asked to speak with Galarraga. Denied the first perfect game in Tigers history, Galarraga appreciated the gesture."You don't see an umpire after the game come out and say, 'Hey, let me tell you I'm sorry,' " Galarraga said. "He felt really bad. He didn't even shower." 

 Joyce went on to make this statement to the sportswriters:

 "It was the biggest call of my career, and I kicked the [stuff] out of it," Joyce said, looking and sounding distraught as he paced in the umpires' locker room. "I just cost that kid a perfect game."  "I thought he beat the throw. I was convinced he beat the throw, until I saw the replay," he said after the Tigers' 3-0 win.  "I don't blame them a bit for anything that was said," Joyce said. "I would've said it myself if I had been Galarraga. I would've been the first person in my face, and he never said a word to me."

 Sports Illustrated writer Tom Verducci also recognized the level of class between these two: 

It was a classy move by Joyce, who also apologized to Galarraga personally. The pitcher told a Venezuelan reporter that Joyce was crying when he offered him his apology. 

"He really feel bad. He probably feel more bad than me," Galarraga told Fox Sports Detroit. "Nobody's perfect, everybody's human. I understand. I give a lot of credit to the guy saying, 'Hey, I need to talk to you because I really say I'm sorry.' That don't happen. You don't see an umpire after the game say 'I'm sorry.'" 

In a game where you will rarely see a veteran umpire cry—let alone apologize, both Joyce and Galarraga showed the kind of class that would make one proud to call this America's Greatest Pastime.  Isn't is sad that this lesson can't be passed on to our government leaders who also sometimes make bad calls?

It's nice to see this kind of class displayed anywhere.  Major, major kudos to both of these guys!

Now, if only we could get the Left to act and speak with this kind of class...

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!

No, seriously, if they could even display some class even occasionally...

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!

Okay, okay, sorry.  Wishful thinking.

Unfortunately, our elected politicians have also revealed their complete lack of class through this incident:

Michigan politicians are practically falling over themselves trying to make sure Wednesday night's effort by Tigers' pitcher Armando Galarraga be recognized as a perfect game.

...

After Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm issued a proclamation declaring Galarraga's effort a perfect game, U.S. Sen. Debbie Stabenow, Michigan Democrat, weighed in, urging Major League Baseball Commissioner Bud Selig to invoke his authority to do what is the best interests of the game and declare this one perfect.

Meanwhile, U.S. Rep. John Dingell, Dearborn Democrat, said he will introduce a resolution in Congress calling on MLB to overturn the call on the field that spoiled the perfect game on the last out in the 9th against the Cleveland Indians.

*sigh*

Aside from the rather obvious idiocy of dealing with something like this rather than any of the actual crises going on in the nation and world today, there's also the question of just why these morons feel the need to stick the government's hand into the situation and force the outcome that they feel is correct based on nothing more than their own momentary whims.  Boy, is this illustrative of how they approach everything, or what?

*sigh*

There's my two cents.

Thieving Slackers

When I first started reading this, I figured I would just post it in one of my linkage updates and call it good. However, the further into it I got, the higher my blood pressure rose until I was thoroughly angry. Rather than try to sum it up, I'm going to post the whole thing from Cassy Fiano at Hot Air's Greenroom, and I strongly encourage you to sink your teeth into the whole thing...it's an important thing to understand:

The housing crisis is still ongoing. While the national conversation has shifted away from foreclosures in favor of unemployment and big government bailouts, many Americans are still in trouble with their mortgages. I seem to remember there used to be a time where, if you were in trouble with a loan, you would pay any little bit you could. Maybe you paid half at the beginning of the month and half on your next paycheck. Maybe it was even less than that. What counted was that you were making the effort. You work with your lender to avoid going into foreclosure at all costs.

That was then. Now, the new hotness is just to say to hell with paying your mortgage. Homeowners are letting themselves go into foreclosure with no intention of paying their mortgages, so that they can use the extra money on truly important things… like going out to eat at Outback and taking trips to the Hard Rock Casino.

For Alex Pemberton and Susan Reboyras, foreclosure is becoming a way of life — something they did not want but are in no hurry to get out of.

Foreclosure has allowed them to stabilize the family business. Go to Outback occasionally for a steak. Take their gas-guzzling airboat out for the weekend. Visit the Hard Rock Casino.

“Instead of the house dragging us down, it’s become a life raft,” said Mr. Pemberton, who stopped paying the mortgage on their house here last summer. “It’s really been a blessing.”

A growing number of the people whose homes are in foreclosure are refusing to slink away in shame. They are fashioning a sort of homemade mortgage modification, one that brings their payments all the way down to zero. They use the money they save to get back on their feet or just get by.

This type of modification does not beg for a lender’s permission but is delivered as an ultimatum: Force me out if you can. Any moral qualms are overshadowed by a conviction that the banks created the crisis by snookering homeowners with loans that got them in over their heads.

“I tried to explain my situation to the lender, but they wouldn’t help,” said Mr. Pemberton’s mother, Wendy Pemberton, herself in foreclosure on a small house a few blocks away from her son’s. She stopped paying her mortgage two years ago after a bout with lung cancer. “They’re all crooks.”

Get that? In today’s loony liberal land, it’s all the lender’s fault. It couldn’t possibly be the homeowner’s fault that they bought a house they couldn’t afford. Right?

Maybe not. The couple quoted in this story, Mr. Pemberton and Ms. Reboyras, aren’t exactly blameless in this situation. Just like most people who go into foreclosure, really.

The couple owe $280,000 on the house, where they live with Ms. Reboyras’s two daughters, their two dogs and a very round pet raccoon named Roxanne. The house is worth less than half that amount — which they say would be their starting point in future negotiations with their lender.

“If they took the house from us, that’s all they would end up getting for it anyway,” said Ms. Reboyras, 46.

One reason the house is worth so much less than the debt is because of the real estate crash. But the couple also refinanced at the height of the market, taking out cash to buy a truck they used as a contest prize for their hired animal trappers.

It was a stupid move by their lender, according to Mr. Pemberton. “They went outside their own guidelines on debt to income,” he said. “And when they did, they put themselves in jeopardy.”

So they refinanced their home to buy a new truck — not even a truck that they needed for themselves, but a truck to give away. And yet, this was a stupid move by the lender?! Right. It’s the big bad predatory lender’s fault for not telling poor Mr. Pemberton that he was a big fat idiot.

And by coincidence, I’m sure, Mr. Pemberton and Ms. Reboyras’ lawyer seeks out these kinds of cases and encourages people to not pay their mortgages. This way, you get to live in your house — for free!

Both generations of Pembertons have hired a local lawyer, Mark P. Stopa. He sends out letters — 1,700 in a recent week — to Floridians who have had a foreclosure suit filed against them by a lender.

Even if you have “no defenses,” the form letter says, “you may be able to keep living in your home for weeks, months or even years without paying your mortgage.”

About 10 new clients a week sign up, according to Mr. Stopa, who says he now has 350 clients in foreclosure, each of whom pays $1,500 a year for a maximum of six hours of attorney time. “I just do as much as needs to be done to force the bank to prove its case,” Mr. Stopa said.

It’s sickening, really. There are people out there milking the system for all its worth, taking no responsibility for their bad decisions, and then blaming the lenders when they end up in trouble. It’s usually the bad decisions of the borrowers that put them into foreclosure to begin with, and then they just want to sit back and do nothing, because somehow, everyone is apparently entitled to live in their home without paying the mortgage on it now. There are always alternatives, ways to avoid foreclosure. It isn’t like selling the home isn’t an option, but no one wants to do that. They can’t renegotiate their loan either, because the lenders are big bad predatory crooks out to get them. Apparently, the right thing to do is to squat in a house you don’t even fully own yet without paying what you legally owe.

In reality, this is theft. It’s a crime, and the bums should be thrown out on the street like they deserve. I have no sympathy for someone who pays nothing on their mortgage and willingly goes into foreclosure so that they can go out to eat, go on airboat rides, and gamble at the Hard Rock Casino.

Part of this is thanks to Democrats and Obama in particular. The endless demonizing of Wall Street and banks and big business has given people like these bums a ready-made excuse to stop paying their mortgages, yet still expect to live in their house. These people said so themselves. The banks are crooks. Lenders are greedy. They’re getting what’s coming to them, right? No one forced these people to take these loans, no one made them refinance, but it’s always someone else’s fault.

I understand that people sometimes fall on hard times. Honest people don’t use that as an excuse to abandon all responsibility and ignore their own bad decision-making. What is happening here is theft and the lowlifes should be thrown out on the street where they belong.

Hey, if they live on the street, they can still use their money on what really matters, like steak at Outback and gambling at a casino.

[deep breath in...cleansing breath out...deep breath in...cleansing breath out...]

These parasites don't deserve a roof over their heads.

I'm sorry, but I have absolutely ZERO sympathy for people like this who flagrantly puts themselves into debt that is so bad that their neighbors (and all the rest of us taxpayers) have to pick up the tab, then laugh it off and go out for steak.

YOU'VE GOT TO BE KIDDING ME!!!

This is the anti-American dream. Rather than following the rules, earning your place, and working hard for what you've got, this lazy, parasitic mindset is what is allowing Mexicans to illegally cross our borders and demand 'rights', property, and government benefits. This is what is enabling an entire generation of young people to pass from grade level to grade level without passing scores simply because their feelings might be hurt otherwise. This is what is preventing summer soccer leagues from keeping score because, GOD FORBID someone has to lose! This is what's allowing frivolous lawsuits over hot coffee. It's sheer idiocy, and it all boils down to the fact that people want to leech off of the productivity and success of others without having to do any real work or put for any real effort on their own.

Entitlement.

It's one of the most insidious effects of rampant liberalism, and it is extremely hard to root out once it's taken hold. I read an article the other day (I would cite it but I don't recall where I saw it) about how this entitlement mentality is similar to a drug addiction - the first hit is free, and every time after that the addict gets more and more desperate for a bigger and bigger snort. The only way out is to hit rock bottom and gut through the horrendous withdrawal symptoms on the way to a true recovery.

Does America have the wisdom to find its way to rock bottom? Does it have the fortitude to gut through the withdrawal symptoms? Facing a historically unprecedented mountain of debt that will bury future generations as surely as a literal mountain of dirt and rock, that appears to be the situation we must answer.

Thieving slackers like the Pembertons are prime examples of entitlement, and prime examples of why America has an existential problem. If the Pembertons and other parasites like them can't beat their own addiction, they'll drag all of the rest of us down with them, and we're all in for some historically unprecedented pain.

There's my two cents.

Obama White House: Bribery Central

Whoa! If only the media wasn't hooked up to a hope-n-change Kool-Aid IV on this one! Of course, this is such a big (and obvious) deal that it may become an issue anyway:

U.S. Senate candidate Andrew Romanoff acknowledged tonight that he discussed three possible jobs with the deputy chief of staff of the Obama administration — all contingent upon a decision by Romanoff not to challenge U.S. Sen. Michael Bennet.

Romanoff said none of the jobs was formally offered, but said the only reason they were discussed with Deputy Chief of Staff Jim Messina was if Romanoff stayed out of the Senate race.

“Mr. Messina also suggested three positions that might be available to me were I not pursuing the Senate race,” Romanoff wrote in a statement. “He added that he could not guarantee my appointment to any of these positions. At no time was I promised a job, nor did I request Mr. Messina’s assistance in obtaining one.”

Hot Air poses the obvious question:
Is Messina guilty of a crime for having made this kinda sorta offer, even without any formal “promise”? Let’s see:

Whoever, directly or indirectly, promises any employment, position, compensation, contract, appointment, or other benefit, provided for or made possible in whole or in part by any Act of Congress, or any special consideration in obtaining any such benefit, to any person as consideration, favor, or reward for any political activity or for the support of or opposition to any candidate or any political party in connection with any general or special election to any political office, or in connection with any primary election or political convention or caucus held to select candidates for any political office, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

I think we can get this one to the jury! Seriously, though, I don’t want Messina charged, partly because he was obviously acting at Rahm Emanuel’s behest (no deputy COS would be authorized to bribe a senate candidate on his own initiative, I assume) and partly because I’m sure this really is D.C. business as usual for both parties.
The point here is to illustrate not that this behavior is unusual, but to illustrate that it is depressingly normal. And, it also happens to be precisely the sort of thing that Obama campaigned on, promising to do the opposite! Just because both sides likely engage in this doesn't make it right, and the American people shouldn't tolerate it from either side.

Of course, this also serves to bring even more pressure and visibility onto the whole Sestak bribery situation. How will the White House spin this? Even in cases where the strictly legal minutiae end up working out, sometimes the public perception is so firmly fixed that a politician will be crushed under its weight alone (remember what killed George Allen's presidential run before it even began?). This may be one of those times. Keep watching.

There's my two cents.

Wednesday, June 2, 2010

Is The Abandon Ship Underway?

I've speculated a number of times (see links below) that Barack Obama won't be President in 2013, at first jokingly and then with increasing seriousness.  Regardless of whether or not you buy the notion of his attempt to re-make America into a socialist pseudo-European state, it is becoming increasingly difficult to ignore the plain and simple fact that Barack Obama is -- as we on the Right predicted before the election -- hopelessly and utterly incompetent as a genuine leader.  Three stories today really help drive home that point, so here are some excerpts.

Obama Doesn't Have A Clue - Dick Morris

The sight of his blithering and blustering while the most massive oil spill in history moves closer to America's beaches not only reminds one of Bush's terrible performance during Katrina, but calls to mind Jimmy Carter's incompetence in the face of the hostage crisis. 

America is watching the president alternate between wringing his hands in helplessness and pointing his finger in blame when he should be solving the most pressing environmental problem America has faced in the past 50 years. We are watching generations of environmental protection swept away as marshes, fisheries, vacation spots, recreational beaches, wetlands, hatcheries and sanctuaries fall prey to the oil spill invasion. And, all the while, the president acts like a spectator, interrupting his basketball games only to excoriate BP for its failure to contain the spill.

Conservatives may dislike Obama because he is a leftist. But liberals are coming to dislike him because he is not a competent progressive. 

Meanwhile, the nation watches nervously as the same policies Obama has brought to our nation are failing badly and publicly in Europe. When Moody's announces that it is considering downgrading bonds issued by the government of the United States of America, we find ourselves, suddenly, in deep trouble. We have had deficits before. But never have they so freaked investors that a ratings agency considered lowering its opinion of our solvency. ...

And the truth begins to dawn on all of us: Obama has no more idea how to work his way out of the economic mess into which his policies have plunged us than he does about how to clean up the oil spill that is destroying our southern coastline.

Both the financial crisis and the oil come ever closer to our shores — one from the east and the other from the south — and, between them, they loom as a testament to the incompetence of our government and of its president.


The Coming Resignation Of Barack Obama - Peter Ferrara

Months ago, I predicted in this column that President Obama would so discredit himself in office that he wouldn't even be on the ballot in 2012, let alone have a prayer of being reelected. Like President Johnson in 1968, who had won a much bigger victory four years previously than Obama did in 2008, President Obama will be so politically defunct by 2012 that he won't even try to run for reelection.

I am now ready to predict that President Obama will not even make it that far. I predict that he will resign in discredited disgrace before the fall of 2012. Like my previous prediction, that is based not just on where we are now, but where we are going under his misleadership.

Is the President Above the Law?

Watergate was supposed to have established that Presidents are not above the law. If that is so, President Obama may have to resign for breaking the law in the Sestak affair.

Rep. Joe Sestak (D-PA) is now the Democrat nominee for the Senate seat held far too long by Arlen Specter. President Obama induced Specter to switch parties and give the Democrats their very temporary, 60 vote, filibuster-proof majority, in return for endorsing him for reelection and promising him no opposition in the Democrat primary. But Sestak had already announced that he was running for the seat, and he refused to get out. Two week ago, Sestak defeated the unprincipled, opportunistic Specter for the Democrat nomination, continuing the perfect string of everyone who Obama endorses and campaigns for going down to defeat.

For months now, Sestak has publicly claimed that President Obama tried to keep his promise to Specter by offering him a high-ranking administration appointment if he would get out of the race. The rumor is that Sestak, formerly an Admiral, was offered appointment as Secretary of the Navy. The problem is that a federal statute explicitly provides that it is a federal felony, punishable by up to one year in prison, to attempt to bribe a candidate with a federal job, or anything of value, to influence an election.

As Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA) has indicated, the White House is now engaged in a coverup that is only making matters worse. Former President Bill Clinton is now claiming that he carried the offer to Sestak of an appointment to an unpaid position on a Presidential Advisory Board in return for dropping out of the race. But that story is not plausible because as a sitting member of Congress he could not have legally served on such a Presidential Board. So is the White House now lying to the American people about the matter?

Moreover, indirectly offering the job through former President Clinton still violates the statute, as does the offer of an unpaid position. That is why Issa, Mark Levin, and others are saying that what the White House is publicly admitting still amounts to a federal crime, which is an impeachable offense. Democrats are going to have to decide if they really believe that presidents are not above the law. Presently, one reason to vote Republican for president is that Republican presidents are subject to the rule of law, but Democrat presidents are not.

Ferrara also hammers the Gulf oil spill, and then moves on to more generalized doom:

Now and for the next six months, we will be enjoying the high point of the Obama economy, the tippy top of the Obamanomics, Keynesian, roller coaster. If Art Laffer's Coming Crash of 2011 arrives next year, or if the economy just dips into another downturn, President Obama no longer enjoys the political base to survive it. With African Americans suffering Depression-level unemployment for over a year now, even that most solid of all political bases will weaken and waver in the face of a renewed downturn.

Under the President's leadership, Congressional Democrats continue to pile more and more taxes on the investment necessary to create jobs and prosperity, "the most punitive tax rates on investment income since the late 1970s," as The Wall Street Journal reported on May 27. Even before Obama and the New Left takeover of Washington, the top 1% of taxpayers were already paying more in income taxes than the bottom 95% combined, as the Tax Foundation has accurately reported based on official IRS data. ...

This punitive tax piracy is already starting to cause capital flight from the U.S., which will accelerate into an outright capital jail break from America next year. That will only hasten a renewed downturn, cripple job creation, and restore rising unemployment.

Moreover, with the federal deficit already at a record smashing $1.6 trillion this year, a renewed recession next year will only cause it to soar further. How long can that go on before we arrive at Greece, where the markets refuse to buy the bonds necessary to finance the deficit, at least without soaring interest rates, which would only cause further economic decline.

Meanwhile, the Fed has long been busily creating new economic bubbles with its overly extended easy money and zero interest rate policies. Monetary policies so loose that they should be considered pornographic are creating new vulnerabilities for the President, which will arise as sudden surprises involving new dollar, interest rate or inflation scares.

Another blind spot for the President is energy policy itself. Those opposed to further offshore drilling need to end their hypocrisy and stop using the remaining oil and gas still available to the rest of us. Cap and tax is one of the biggest economic and political blunders in history just waiting to happen ... As the price of gas climbs over $4 a gallon due to that and to President Obama's anti-production policies, the public riot demanding immediate change in leadership will surprise establishment Washington.

Adding to all of this are the grave vulnerabilities posed by Iran successfully developing nuclear weapons, and President Obama's foreign policy weaknesses generally, which just invite war. Devilishly pursuing the opposite of every one of Reagan's policies, instead of Peace Through Strength, Obama is inviting War Through Weakness. If Iran launches a bloody attack on Israel, open calls for his resignation will be widespread. If Iran uses a nuclear weapon in that attack, or in any other attack against American interests, the Obama Administration will be over politically.

The President himself has laid the foundation for his biggest political vulnerability of all. He won our votes and the election in 2008 with "the firm pledge" not to raise taxes "in any form" on anyone making less than $250,000 a year. Now he has already backed away from that pledge to the American people by creating a Presidential Deficit Commission, with "everything on the table," including tax increases on working people in direct violation of the pledge. The much discussed Value Added Tax (VAT) could not be a more direct violation of the no tax increase pledge, increasing the prices of everything working families buy.

When the President directly violates the pledge that got him elected by openly endorsing such a tax increase, his resignation will immediately become a central political issue. The above problems and vulnerabilities will come together to increase the pressure for resignation to unbearable levels.

While I would welcome such calls for his resignation with open arms, that unfortunately means that things have gotten so bad in this country that people are desperate for change IMMEDIATELY, and I don't relish the thought of living through that kind of scenario.  Ferrara thinks that all of this will combine into so much pressure that Obama will basically get shoved out the door by the Democrat party because they'll realize the party itself is in danger of extinction if they hang onto him.  They'll dress it up in health problems, spending more time with family, or something like that, but the bottom line is that he will not be given the Democrat nomination in 2012.  This suggestion is actually quite similar with my previous assertions, though perhaps a bit more fleshed out.  How realistic is it?  We'll find out over the next two and a half years, but with each passing day, we see more examples of not only Obama's radical Leftist nature (which most of America rejects) as well as his complete incompetence in basic leadership (which no one on either side will put up with), and this scenario becomes more and more realistic.

And we may already be seeing the early warning signs of the abandon ship...

Elected Officials Say No Thanks To Obama

Congressmen Jason Altmire and Tim Murphy have previous engagements. Sen. Bob Casey Jr. and Rep. Mike Doyle are out of town on anniversary trips with their wives. Allegheny County Executive Dan Onorato will be campaigning in Philadelphia.

When President Obama and Sen. Arlen Specter land at Pittsburgh International Airport today, Mayor Luke Ravenstahl will receive them by himself.

The rest of the region's top elected officials declined White House invitations to attend Obama's speech at Carnegie Mellon University this afternoon, their offices said.

This could also be because of what Ferrara mentioned above - Obama is 4-for-4, with all four of his preferred major national candidates losing in their recent elections.  And when the President suddenly becomes anathema to success, well, you can see where the end of that road goes.  That's great - the sooner the better, if you ask me.  I'd much prefer Barack Obama going down in political flames long before he takes this great nation down in real flames with him.

There's my two cents.


Previous Links
Take off the tinfoil hat!
A year of hope-n-change
This is why I'm suspicious
Conspiracy theory fun house
Hillary must be plotting
How deep does the rabbit hole go?

Gag Alert: 'The Word' Edition

The woman knows no shame:



Astounding. Truly astounding. Doug Powers offers a few points for your consideration:

Kind of like watching Jack Kevorkian trying to gain the trust of attendees at an AARP convention, isn’t it?

“The word was made flesh” — unless that flesh wasn’t wanted for any reason whatsoever.

Here’s a bit of Pelosi’s abortion voting record from On the Issues:

Voted YES on expanding research to more embryonic stem cell lines. (Jan 2007)
Voted YES on allowing human embryonic stem cell research. (May 2005)
Voted NO on restricting interstate transport of minors to get abortions. (Apr 2005)
Voted NO on making it a crime to harm a fetus during another crime. (Feb 2004)
Voted NO on banning partial-birth abortion except to save mother’s life. (Oct 2003)
Voted NO on forbidding human cloning for reproduction & medical research. (Feb 2003)
Voted NO on funding for health providers who don’t provide abortion info. (Sep 2002)
Voted NO on banning Family Planning funding in US aid abroad. (May 2001)
Voted NO on federal crime to harm fetus while committing other crimes. (Apr 2001)
Voted NO on banning partial-birth abortions. (Apr 2000)
Voted NO on barring transporting minors to get an abortion. (Jun 1999)
Rated 100% by NARAL, indicating a pro-choice voting record. (Dec 2003)
Rated 0% by the NRLC, indicating a pro-choice stance. (Dec 2006)

If there’s a bumper sticker slogan that best represents Nancy Pelosi, it’s “What Would Jesus Not Do?”

Sorry, I know that was probably as unpleasant for you to watch as it was for me, but we need to understand the depths of hypocrisy to which these people will go. Or, if you prefer it in different terms, we need to understand just how twisted, incoherent, and morally bankrupt these people are.

Whatever works. You get the point.

There's my two cents.

Don't Get Suckered By The May Employment Numbers

Hot Air:

Advance word on this week's employment numbers due on Friday morning is that the figure will be eye-popping — a growth of over a half-million jobs in May.  However, only a third or less will come from the private sector.  Most of the rest will come from an explosion of Census Bureau hires last month, some of which have already ended, according to The Hill:

Hiring by the U.S. Census Bureau is expected to spike May's job figures dramatically.

Economist Mark Zandi of Moody's.com projects the economy will add 575,000 jobs in May, while the Economic Policy Institute's (EPI) rough projection is for 560,000 jobs. …

Vice President Joe Biden, speaking at a Democratic fundraiser on Tuesday, touted what he said would be a positive report for Democrats, who are hoping a revitalized economy will help them in this fall's elections. He said the May report would be "well beyond" the 290,000 jobs created in April, according to Reuters.

The numbers pose a problem for the administration, however, in terms of their reflection of economic growth.

Zandi expects that only 150,000 of the jobs created in May will come from the private sector, while 425,000 new jobs are sparked by the once-a-decade census.

Those jobs are temporary ones that will disappear as the Census completes the process of collecting data from people who did not mail in their forms.

In fact, if Zandi is correct, the inflated number will obscure a drop in private-sector growth.  April's employment figures showed the addition of around 224,000 private-sector jobs, the first significant growth against population expansion in more than two years.  Adding 150,000 jobs would still beat population growth — it takes adding more than 100K jobs to keep pace — but not by much.  That would signal a slowing economy, not a move to sustainable growth, although one month could also be a hiccup — just as April's could have been a hiccup as well.

But that's not all.  We've already been over how crooked the entire Census project appears to be in terms of employment.  John Crudele at the New York Post also throws this into the mix:

A couple weeks ago I found out that Census was repeatedly hiring and firing workers without any apparent reason. I questioned if this was being done to artificially boost the nation's employment figures since the Labor Dept. considers it a new job created whenever someone is hired to work as little as one hour in a month.

Was Census churning jobs to make the economy look healthier than it really is?

Could be.  If so, HA's conclusion is awfully hard to escape:

...the big issue for the Obama administration is what happens when the Census Bureau completes its work.  Hundreds of thousands of workers will be back looking for jobs that won't exist, which will spike the unemployment number later in the year, just when voters go to the polls.  If the private-sector numbers come in as weakly as Zandi predicts, it could be a sign that we've just about squeezed all of the growth possible from the artificial stimuli applied by the Democrats.

And what happens then?  When everything they've tried has demonstrably failed, and when even the made-up money is gone, what then?  Double dip recession?  Great Depression 2.0?  Greece?!

Barack Obama and liberal Democrats have no answers, no solutions, and no hope of bringing anything to this nation but oppression, deception, and destruction.  The longer they retain power, the worse off we'll all be.

There's my two cents.

There's Also That Small Matter Of The Oil Spill

It's amazing what a difference a single day makes, isn't it? For example, here's the latest total about-face by the Obama administration, this time on the Gulf oil spill:

The old paradigm:

The American people should know that from the moment this disaster began, the federal government has been in charge of the response effort. As far as I’m concerned, BP is responsible for this horrific disaster, and we will hold them fully accountable on behalf of the United States as well as the people and communities victimized by this tragedy.

We will demand that they pay every dime they owe for the damage they’ve done and the painful losses that they’ve caused. And we will continue to take full advantage of the unique technology and expertise they have to help stop this leak.

But make no mistake: BP is operating at our direction. Every key decision and action they take must be approved by us in advance. I’ve designated Admiral Thad Allen, who has nearly four decades of experience responding to such disasters, as the national incident commander. And if he orders BP to do something to respond to this disaster, they are legally bound to do it.

The new paradigm:

Struggling to convey command of the worsening Gulf of Mexico oil spill, the Obama administration is taking steps to distance itself from BP and is dispatching Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. to the Gulf Coast to meet with federal and state prosecutors. The Holder trip could signal that the environmental calamity might become the subject of a criminal investigation. …

The relationship between the federal government and the oil company has been an awkward collaboration all along — “We have them by the neck,” Interior Secretary Ken Salazar said of BP in congressional testimony last week — but it reached a turning point Monday when the administration said it no longer wants to share a podium with BP at the daily briefing in Louisiana. Instead, the national incident commander, Coast Guard Adm. Thad W. Allen, will give a solo briefing wherever he happens to be.

... With bad news washing up everywhere, the administration has been desperate to convince the public that the government, and not the oil company, is fully in charge of the crisis and mounting a robust response.

Oops!

Oh, and there's this little video that the NRSC put together:



Oops again! Someone really needs to clue in the White House about this nifty little website called YouTube, and the fact that any 12-year old kid with a cell phone can post videos to it in seconds. They keep seeming to forget.

In a poor parody of seriousness, the Obama administration appears to have run out of real experts, because they're now tapping Hollywood director James Cameron for advice on what to try next. Um...correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think there are any naked blue-skinned giants running around on the bottom of the ocean, so I'm not sure how he's going to help.

The radical Left also thinks that expanded government is still the right answer:
It’s time for the federal government to put BP under temporary receivership, which gives the government authority to take over BP’s operations in the Gulf of Mexico until the gusher is stopped. This is the only way the public know what’s going on, be confident enough resources are being put to stopping the gusher, ensure BP’s strategy is correct, know the government has enough clout to force BP to use a different one if necessary, and be sure the President is ultimately in charge.
When all you've got is a hammer...

Rush Limbaugh helps put this spill in perspective:
The official climatologist of the EIB Network, Roy Spencer, has sent in a chart of oil spills through the years. The second-to-smallest oil spill through the years since 1991 to present is the Deepwater Horizon rig in the Gulf of Mexico. A deliberate spill by Iraqi forces 1991-1992 spilled 500 million gallons of oil. Average yearly spills, rigs and tankers, global, every year, 250 million gallons of oil spilled from rigs and tankers. As I keep talking about: In 1979, the Ixtoc 1 rig in the Gulf of Mexico spilled about 140 million gallons. Then the Amoco Cadiz, which is a ship, the English Channel, about 60 million. Torrey Canyon, south England, a ship, about 30 million. The Exxon Valdez was 11 million. And so far we're at about 25 or 30 million gallons; this is assuming 15,000 barrels a day through May at the Deepwater Horizon rig. So it's the second smallest oil spill since 1991 or '92. Not that it isn't bad, don't misunderstand. I'm just trying to put things in perspective.
Here's the visual:



Elisabeth Rosenthal also points out that the volume of oil spilled in this particular incident is a mere day's worth of spillage compared to some parts of the world:
John Vidal, the paper’s environment editor, movingly recalls a trip to the Niger Delta a few years ago, where he literally swam in “pools of light Nigerian crude.”

A network of decades-old pipes and oil extraction equipment in the delta has been plagued by serious leaks and spills. “More oil is spilled from the delta’s network of terminals, pipes, pumping stations and oil platforms every year than has been lost in the Gulf of Mexico,” he writes.
Yeah, this is bad, but don't think it's the end of the world, or even the Gulf of Mexico. It needs to be resolved as quickly as possible, but this planet is damned tough, and was designed with the ability to recover from things like this. It may take some time, but it'll happen.

The point is that we need to keep the proper perspective as we talk about how to move forward. Suspending all oil exploration, drilling, and production as a knee-jerk reaction to this one spill that is, historically speaking, far from catastrophic is a tremendously bad idea that will have extremely serious ramifications to America's economy and energy sectors for decades to come. Let's stop and think before we overreact, shall we?

There's my two cents.

Israel Vs. Turkey: Condemnations And Insanity

In case you missed what happened, here's a great recap:

A motley crew of Turkish Islamists, European leftists and Israeli Arab leaders yesterday succeeded in provoking a bloody clash with Israeli forces that were enforcing an arms embargo against Hamas terrorists in Gaza. Six ships with more than 600 “peace activists” left Cyprus bound for Gaza but were intercepted by the Israeli Navy and special forces commandos before they could land in Gaza. The first five ships complied with Israeli forces, but the passengers aboard the sixth vessel, the Mavi Marmara, attacked Israeli commandos with steel poles, knives and pepper spray, provoking a battle that claimed at least nine lives.

According to an eyewitness account by a reporter:

Navy commandoes slid down to the vessel one by one, yet then the unexpected occurred: The passengers that awaited them on the deck pulled out bats, clubs, and slingshots with glass marbles, assaulting each soldier as he disembarked. The fighters were nabbed one by one and were beaten up badly, yet they attempted to fight back.

However, to their misfortune, they were only equipped with paintball rifles used to disperse minor protests, such as the ones held in Bilin. The paintballs obviously made no impression on the activists, who kept on beating the troops up and even attempted to wrest away their weapons.

One soldier who came to the aid of a comrade was captured by the rioters and sustained severe blows. The commandoes were equipped with handguns but were told they should only use them in the face of life-threatening situations. When they came down from the chopper, they kept on shouting to each other “don’t shoot, don’t shoot,” even though they sustained numerous blows.

Caught off-guard by the violent attacks of the “peace activists,” the Israeli commandos were compelled to use firearms in self-defense. Many of the passengers on board the Mavi Marmara were believed to be members of a Turkish Islamist charity organization, the Humanitarian Relief Fund, that has a long history of support for radical Islamist causes and deploying jihadists to Afghanistan, Bosnia and Chechnya. The Humanitarian Relief Fund is part of an umbrella group, the Union for Good, that was created by Hamas leaders in 2000 to aid fundraising for Hamas’s radical Islamist agenda. The U.S. government has designated the Union for Good as a terrorist organization.

The biggest surprise in all this is that the Israeli soldiers were so unprepared for violence. Really?? Strange, because the jihadists-turned-peace-activists released a video the day before pledging to use violence to provoke the Israeli Defense Force into making martyrs out of them. Oh, and ships going from Islamic nations to Israel are so often just so darned peaceful, aren't they? And sure enough, several dozen of these peace activists have now been determined to be Al Qaeda members. Go figure. I think this is just another case of Israel trying to defend itself while walking on eggshells, and coming off badly because of it. Cassy Fiano offers this analysis with which I agree completely:
Of course, the left will do anything they can to demonize Israel, so they will ignore and manipulate the facts of the situation. (Don’t call them anti-Semitic, though!) The fact is this: Israel’s actions were perfectly justified. The Gaza blockade was in effect, the flotilla knew this, and was intent on running the blockade after being told to turn back. IDF soldiers boarded the ship, and we all know what happened. What were they supposed to do? Let the ship run the blockade without knowing if there were weapons on board that could be smuggled to Palestinians and then used to kill innocent Israeli civilians? (And of course, several caches of weapons were found on board.) Once faced with violence on board, should they have just stood there and let themselves be slaughtered? Apparently, these are the only two options for Israelis from the left: let people smuggle whatever they want into Palestine, a country filled with backwards, bloodthirsty, homicidal maniacs intent on eradicating all Jews from the planet, or when confronted with violence, choose not to fight even in their own self-defense. (Again, don’t call them anti-Semitic though! They love Israel!) Because Israel chooses to not allow themselves to be annihilated, they are always the bad guys in the eyes of the left, no matter what. This case is just another example of that.
In my initial post about this incident, I wrote this:
As Israel's strongest ally, it is now time for the U.S. to step up and help them out. Will we? With Barack Obama in the White House, I'm not so sure.
Ahem:



I suppose the fact that the Obama administration waited for a whole day before condemning our ally should be considered good news. Then again, is any condemnation of one of our allies for defending itself against radical Islamic terrorists actually a good thing?

Not in my book.

As if this wasn't enough to worry about, we now see news that Iran has enough enriched uranium to make not one nuclear weapon, but two. Oh, and Syria is has also confessed to conducting nuclear weapons experiments, too. This happened at the mysterious facility that Israel took out a couple years ago.

Are things spinning out of control?

There's my two cents.


Related Reading via Drudge:
Activists send new boat to challenge blockade...
Thousands of Gazans rush for Egyptian border...
Turkey's PM says Israel should be punished...
...Israeli gov't defends
'Next time we'll use more force'...
Passengers were armed, 'no peace activists'...
VIDEO...
U.N. Security Council Condemns 'Acts'...
Ahmadinejad: 'Israeli commandos are wild dogs'...
...wants Netanyahu to face trial
JERUSALEM POST News Feed...
REPORT: Lebanon fires on Israeli warplanes...

Turkish lawmakers urge govt to review Israel ties...
Says Israel has 'criminal status'...
'Activists threw stun grenades'...
US consulate issues advisory...

Tuesday, June 1, 2010

The Hope Of Hope-N-Change

Unfortunately, it's significant:

Yesterday the White House unveiled its national security strategy. It came in basically three parts.

Part One is the “anything but Bush” part. Where the goal is to put as much distance between Obama and Bush – even where there is not a lot space. Renaming the War on Terrorism, the war on al Qaeda is a case in point. Did the Bush administration not know it was fighting al Qaeda? Did Obama stop doing Predator strikes?

Part Two is an overwhelming desire to substitute soft power for hard power. The problem is that soft power – like diplomacy – is not a substitute for hard power. Obama has already given us an object lesson in how this really works with the New START treaty. The US gave the Russians everything they wanted and in return got nothing other than ensuring Russia will be a dominant nuclear power for the next half century while the US nuclear deterrent continues to atrophy.

Part Three of the strategy is living in the world of wishful thinking. It emphasizes engagement and cooperation. But the strategy has no strategy for when the other side chooses not to cooperate as in the case of Iran. The US opted to engage Iran. Iran opted to make parodies about US foreign policy.

Hope is not a strategy…but it is the Obama national security strategy.

Feeling safer yet?

There's my two cents.

DemCare Is Taking On Water

This is great news:

As they followed one another off the political cliff in voting for the health-care overhaul, Democratic senators and representatives comforted themselves with their own self-created myth that, although ObamaCare was horribly unpopular as a bill, it would prove to be quite fetching as a law.  Furthermore, this transformation, this change they could believe in, would take place sooner rather than later — as voters would reward rather than punish them for passing ObamaCare in clear and open defiance of popular will.

In the two months since, President Obama has pulled out all the stops, aggressively trying to sell the overhaul while also rolling out ostensibly popular provisions ahead of schedule.  These provisions include a federal mandate that insurers cover all "children" up to the age of 26 on their mom's and dad's policies, with costs being borne through somewhat higher premiums for all families; and a tax credit for small businesses, but only — or at least mostly — for very small businesses (those with nine or fewer workers) with very low-paid full-time employees (those averaging less than $25,000 in annual income).

Unfortunately (from the perspective of ObamaCare supporters), a steady stream of revelations of previously undiscovered horrors buried in the bowels of ObamaCare appears to have more than negated any gains that the administration might otherwise have made.  Since passage, reports have revealed that ObamaCare would cost over $1 trillion by any standard, according to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), not "merely" $940 billion as previously reported (while its total costs in its real first decade, 2014 to 2023, would continue to be well over $2 trillion); that ObamaCare has prompted major corporations to discuss dropping their employer-provided health-care plans; that businesses would have to file 1099s not only for every person to whom they pay $600 in wages but for every vendor with whom they do $600 in business, thereby imposing a paperwork nightmare and incentivizing companies to avoid doing business with a myriad of small firms rather than a handful of big ones; that ObamaCare would create 159 new federal agencies, offices, or programs; that the Obama administration's Medicare Chief Actuary says ObamaCare would raise U.S. health costs by $311 billion in relation to current law and would shift about 14 million people off of employer-provided insurance — and some of them onto Medicaid; that ObamaCare's would discourage employment, as — for example — hiring a 25th worker would cost a business $5,600 in addition to wages and benefits; that ObamaCare would impose a severe marriage penalty, offering additional subsidies as high as $10,425 a year if couples merely avoid marriage; that a lone provision in ObamaCare, which would penalize employers if their employees spend more than 9.5 percent of their household income on insurance premiums, would cut the net income of businesses like White Castle by more than half; that even though ObamaCare was supposed to get people out of emergency rooms and into doctors' offices, those who build emergency rooms say the effect will be just the opposite and that they are gearing up for increased business; that doctors shortages are looming and would be accentuated by ObamaCare, both because more people would seek care (otherwise, what would the $2 trillion be buying?) and because fewer people would likely enter a demanding profession that would now promise greater restrictions and lower pay; and that President Obama's nominee to head Medicare and Medicaid under ObamaCare is an open advocate of the British National Health Services' NICE (National Institute of Clinical Excellence) and its methods of rationing care.

These revelations appear to have taken a toll.  Together, they seem to have made a notoriously unpopular law significantly less popular.

Hit the link for all the details of polling that shows DemCare is even less popular now than when it was signed into law.  The point of the article is to show that repeal is definitely on the table.  Americans definitely want health care reform, but they never did want this abomination, and if Republicans open their damned eyes and grow a spine they'd be able to ride the crest of this wave, take back majorities in Congress, and throw out DemCare before its worst insidiousness becomes reality.  Once DemCare is gone, we can start again on things that will truly benefit Americans, but we cannot 'fix' a fundamentally flawed starting point, so repeal must be the first step.  If we want to restore America, there can be no other course of action for conservatives.

On a related note, Canada is now rethinking their system of government health care.  Guess what they're moving toward because it's a better system?  Privatization.  Seems they think their (government controlled) system is too expensive and has an undesirable lack of quality to it.  Hmmm...

So, all these things together indicate that repeal is no pipe dream, no fantasy, and not an unattainable goal.  Far from it.  We should demand nothing less from our elected representatives.

There's my two cents.

Linkage

Our rights come from God
Tragedy: Rifqa Bary dealing with homicidal religious parents...and cancer
More evidence suggesting a double dip recession is on the way
Exposing the grand jihad (in the Oval Office)
Slouching toward irrelevance
Judge prevents the execution of a serial rapist and murderer who himself wants to die on the basis of the fact that his sexual sadism was a 'mitigating factor'...and Obama wants him on a federal appeals court
The Obama administration chews the fat
What is Barack Obama thinking?
House bill would give $2.5 billion to expand welfare rolls
Todd Palin for border czar!
The truth about the dire domestic threat from Obama and ACORN...from a former ACORN insider
Did the stimulus create or save jobs?  Again, no.
Down, down, down goes his credibility...
Taliban using chemical weapons against U.S. soldiers

The Rich And Their Taxes

It's never bad to have another reminder about who pays what taxes. Here's a quick video that hits the high points:



For much, much more, check out these previous posts.

And don't ever forget how it really works...

There's my two cents.

Weekend Round-Up

Once again, a great deal happened over the weekend, so let's hit the high points briefly.

Big Oil
Multiple new attempts to plug the oil gusher in the Gulf of Mexico have failed, and it now looks like this economic disaster will continue for months. President Obama's swift and decisive reaction is to bus in props people to stand there while he gives a statement in a fake photo op to sucker you into thinking he cares. Oh, and did you know that he proposed down-sizing the Coast Guard just a couple months before this all happened? Great foresight there, champ. Too bad he also wants to downsize the military...

Anyway, the photo op may have been complete fakery, but his statement was all too real, as he used this spill to call for a complete ban on oil drilling. Not just in the Gulf of Mexico, and not just dangerous or troubled rigs...all oil drilling:
He made a resounding push for clean energy legislation and referenced the House cap and trade bill passed last year and the one recently introduced in the Senate. He also suspended or canceled a number of lease sales off the coasts of American waters and extended a moratorium on deep-sea offshore oil drilling permits.
I can't wait to see what that'll do to the cost of gas. Here's the bottom line:
If “clean energy” legislation moves forward, higher energy costs will spread throughout the economy as producers everywhere try to cover their higher production costs by raising their product prices, further impacting Americans. The result will be a much slower economy and lost jobs at a time when the top priority for Americans is economic growth.

Also adversely impacting America’s economic recovery and long-term energy policy in President Obama’s speech was his announcement to cancel or suspend lease sales in the Arctic, Atlantic and Western Gulf. “Domestic oil production is an important part of our overall energy needs,” President Obama said in his speech, but his announcements do not reflect that. There are billions of barrels of oil and trillions of cubic feet of natural gas under these waters that could possibly create tens of thousands of jobs as well as create revenues for financially strapped state governments and increase revenues for federal governments.

Controlling the energy sector is the third leg -- after health care and the financial industry -- of the government takeover of America, so you can bet your bottom dollar that they'll continue to push for some kind of controlling regulation, be it cap-n-tax, EPA over-reaches, or this kind of an 'emergency' ban on fossil fuel acquisition.


Time for the dog food!
Tsk...tsk...tsk...!

Back in February it was Armageddon. Republican Senator Jim Bunning was blocking an extension of unemployment insurance on a matter of principle. He simply wanted Congress to cut spending somewhere to pay for the extension. And by block, I mean he refused to agree to an extension by unanimous consent which would have put a lot of senators, of both parties, in the uncomfortable and unaccustomed position of taking a stand on an issue. The Huffington Post nearly developed an industry in demeaning a handful of senators who were simply requiring a recorded vote.

Yesterday, Congress quietly left town for Memorial Day with a bill to extend unemployment benefits still not passed. Tens of thousands will lose benefits on Tuesday. No one blocked the bill. Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi simply couldn’t get their act together, the House getting around to acting on the bill only after the Senate had adjourned.

The crickets you hear chirping at the lefty blogs, like Huffington Post, is the sound of abject and unprincipled hypocrisy. Altogether it is unsurprising.

Why, without this extension, da' po' people will haf to eat dog food, won't dey? But wait...this happened purely because the Democrats in charge couldn't get their crap together before going on vacation. Hm, how to spin this...? Oooh...oooh...I know! It was George W. Bush's fault.


Skirmishes
It looks like a new conflict with Israel may be opening up:

The United States has a major problem in Turkey, which under increasingly authoritarian Islamist rule, has become a primary player in undermining U.S. policy in the Middle East, not to mention a growing antagonist of Israel.

I have posted on Turkey's Islamist government before. The ploy recently to announce a farce agreement (along with Brazil) to reprocess some Iranian nuclear materials as a means of helping Iran avoid international sanctions, was a deliberate attempt to undermine the United States efforts against Iran.

Now, Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan's Islamist political party along with the Turkish government helped organize the flotilla trying to break the Israeli military blockade of Gaza.

Let's be clear, this flotilla had nothing to do with humanitarian supplies, which could have been shipped by land. The flotilla, if successful, would have opened the door to military supplies to Hamas concealed in later shipments.

Iranian desire to turn Gaza into the equivalent of the Hezbollah missile arsenal was the real purpose of the flotilla, with European useful idiots tagging along. That Turkey played a leading role as proxy for Iran in breaking the blockade is yet another sign that Turkey's growing alignment with Iran is a harbinger of bad things to come.

The flotilla was a collective human shield operation in which civilians, including reportedly including an 18 month old child, were put on the ships either to dissuade the Israelis from stopping the ships, or alternatively, to create an international incident. Prior to the flotilla launching, the leader of Hamas announced that it would be a triumph regardless of whether the flotilla landed or was stopped by Israel.
Israel stopped the flotilla, and 14 people ended up dead. Turkey is threatening a military response, which is exactly what was predicted would happen. As Israel's strongest ally, it is now time for the U.S. to step up and help them out. Will we? With Barack Obama in the White House, I'm not so sure.

More details to come as these events unfold.

There's my two cents.

The Beginning Of The End

I've been doing this blog for about three years now, and I can honestly say it has been one of the most exciting, maddening, informative, depressing, uplifting, and illuminating experiences I've ever had.

Sadly, all things must come to an end.


When I started this blog, I did it for a couple of reasons. First and foremost, I was angry about what was going on in this country. I thought that there was a whole lot of lying, corruption, and Leftward leaning going on, and most people had no idea of what was happening around them. I thought America was a collective bunch of frogs in heating water, oblivious to the rising temperature. I, for one, was certainly one of those frogs for a very long time! I'm not quite sure what it was that woke me up, but once it happened, I couldn't sit still and watch it all unfold without saying something. I wanted to find an outlet where I could spread the word of things that were truly important and would have a real impact on real people like you and me, and I wanted to inform people of those things.

In Tornado Alley across the Midwest, we have sirens resting atop very tall polls all over the place, and when a tornado is near, they emit an ear-splitting shriek that warns people to get under cover NOW. I intended this blog to serve as one of those sirens...an admittedly small one, but a siren nonetheless. But look where we are now - with the election and subsequent 16 months of liberal Democrat distributed monarchy, I think that a whole heckuva lot of Americans are now feeling the whipping winds and seeing the dark storm clouds all around them, and are ready and waiting to take action at the ballot box in the near future. In short, America is becoming more and more informed each day simply by waking up and witnessing what the radical Leftists in charge of America are doing. I have absolute confidence that every day Americans like you and me will rise up and take this country back, fix the mess they made, and move on...but the warning sirens are no longer necessary when the tornado is right there tearing up your own front yard.


The second reason is much more personal, if you will indulge me for a moment. I think I had this starry-eyed fantasy of growing the blog from nothing to thousands of readers and thus securing some sort of paying gig as a top-notch professional blogger. While that would have been terrific, I've come to the perhaps obvious but no less disappointing conclusion that it just ain't gonna' happen. I've often talked about common sense conservatism as including the ability and willingness to see the world as it is rather than simply how we want it to be, so it's time to walk the talk, put this fantasy aside, and move on with the business of real life and other projects. There is more than one way to be an active and participating conservative in this country, so it's time to move on to something else. Blogging is great, but if this 'career' door is closed to me, then I really should stop walking face first into it.


All that being said, this has been a tremendously rewarding experience for me. Over the past three years I've learned an enormous amount about our government, our history, and how things really work in the world, probably more than through all of my years of formal education, and I hope you've learned right along with me! But, it's time for the curtain call, and to wrap things up. For those of you who know me personally, you can bet I'll keep up with current events and politics, and (as you know) I will always be more than happy to share what I know about what's going on, who's doing what, and anything else that might apply to various political goings on. Ask away! :)


Normal blogging will continue until June 10th, but as of that date, the domain name "http://www.theresmytwocents.com" will expire, so I'm assuming the URL of 2Cents will automatically revert to the original free address, "http://theresmytwocents.blogspot.com". I don't have any plans to actually take the blog down any time soon -- it will hopefully remain a resource for you if you need to look up old stories, links, or videos, and the link lists should go a long way toward directing you to many excellent resources that remain current and active -- so I plan to leave it there. But, no new content of my own will be added from that point on. You can still reach me via the e-mail address on the top right of the blog, especially if you'd like to offer me gainful employment as a blogger. ;)

So, there it is: today is the beginning of the end. It is with many mixed emotions that I bid you farewell. This has been a tremendous journey, and I thank you for taking it with me. I sincerely wish you the best in whatever direction your future takes, and perhaps we will embark on a new journey sometime in the future.


From the bottom of my heart, I thank you!

2Cents