Tuesday, October 20, 2009

Obama Continues To Fail On Afghanistan

Obama's indecision on Afghanistan is getting our troops killed and making America the laughingstock of the international community:

This Week's Excuse For Delaying A Decision On Troops To Afghanistan Is.....

If you had "Murky Election Results In Afghanistan" in the pool, you win!

"We would love the luxury of this debate to be reduced down to just one question -- additional troops, 40,000," Emanuel told CNN's "State of the Union" on Sunday. "This is a much more complex decision."
"The question, though... does not come [down to] how many troops you send, but do you have a credible Afghan partner for this process that can provide the security and the type of services that the Afghan people need?" the chief of staff added.
Yes, the Afghanistan election was filled with fraud and there's talk that Karzi might not submit to a possible runoff after his provisional vote totals were lowered due to fraud.
The question for Mr. Emanuel is...so what?
That's a good point.  After all, the 2008 election right here at home was loaded with fraud, but Obama had no problem jumping all over those results, did he?

Ace of Spades reminds us:
Afghanistan, according to Obama,

"...(I)s not a war of choice. This is a war of necessity," Obama told the annual Veterans of Foreign Wars conference -- cautioning that the insurgency would not be defeated overnight. "Those who attacked America on 9/11 are plotting to do so again. If left unchecked, the Taliban insurgency will mean an even larger safe haven from which Al Qaeda would plot to kill more Americans."
Granted, all Obama statements come with an expiration date and the above is 2 months old, but winning a war of necessity has nothing to do with the legitimacy of the Afghan central government.
Yes, COIN Operations should be done in support of an indigenous government but it doesn't have to be a fully functioning and legitimate central government. 
There are regional and traditional governing bodies we can work with to provide security and use as a means to funnel construction project money. The idea that our national security is being held hostage to the purity of the Afghan elections is a laughable as it is scary.
While Obama plays Hamlet on the Potomac, Al Qaeda continues to train terrorists who want to attack western targets.
Of course, what our national security is actually being held hostage to is Obama's desire to hold his left wing base together through the health care fight. Quite the profile in courage our Nobel Peace Laureate in Chief is.
The man is dangerous to American interests in all kinds of ways.

There's my two cents.

No comments: