Saturday, November 1, 2008

Election Update - The Criminality Continues

Here are some pieces of information that I think are important for you to know as we come to the final three days before the election.

Barack Obama talks about reaching across the aisle when he's President so we can all sing kumbaya together. However, Gateway Pundit posts on an article at the crazy-Left website DailyKos where Barack Obama suggests that Democrats need to purge the moderates from their party:
According to the storyline that drives many advocacy groups and Democratic activists - a storyline often reflected in comments on this blog - we are up against a sharply partisan, radically conservative, take-no-prisoners Republican party. They have beaten us twice by energizing their base with red meat rhetoric and single-minded devotion and discipline to their agenda. In order to beat them, it is necessary for Democrats to get some backbone, give as good as they get, brook no compromise, drive out Democrats who are interested in “appeasing” the right wing, and enforce a more clearly progressive agenda.

The country, finally knowing what we stand for and seeing a sharp contrast, will rally to our side and thereby usher in a new progressive era.
So, not only has Obama not shown one whit of history in reaching across the aisle, but he actively pushes the strategy of purging his own party of those who are less-than-hardcore-liberal. Quite the uniter, don't you think?

Next, let's re-visit Obama's promise to NOT raise taxes on anyone making less than $250,000. He's been preaching this number for months...until the last couple weeks. We've seen it drop from $250,000 to $200,000, then Biden dropped it to $150,000, and now Gov. Bill Richardson has lowered it even further:





Hot Air comments:
Either Team Obama really doesn’t understand their own policies, or they’re trying to make sure that no one else does. What does that tell people about the competence of this campaign and its candidate?
Bill Dyer looks at it this way:

Look, friends and neighbors, Barack Obama has already broken the biggest financial promise he's ever made, when he decided to reject the public financing he swore he'd take. Not only did he break that promise, he then proceeded to raise and spend hundreds of millions of additional dollars, including millions of dollars in illegal, untraceable contributions gathered through an internet scam based on turned-off anti-fraud software.

Now Obama, his own Veep nominee, and one of their principal campaign surrogates are all over the lot on something as simple as the financial break-point for his tax cut. They can't keep a promise or tell a straight story, but yet they insist that you must trust them with your tax dollars.

The old saying is: "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me." But what's the old saying for "Fool me over and over and over and over again"?

Oh yeah, I forgot: It's "Change We Can Believe In."

This is a clear warning: he will hit the middle class with tax cuts! If he's already cut his promised tax level by over half, do you really expect him to keep any promise regarding tax cuts? If you do, go back to drinking your Kool-Aid.

Our next update is on the topic of vote stealing. It appears that Obots are continuing to pressure disabled folks into voting for the Obamessiah. These reports have now popped up in four states. Apparently they know they can't win through honest means, thus prompting such outrageous tactics. This hits the bottom of the sewer and digs right on through.

As a conveniently timed follow up to my post yesterday about diagnosing Obot-ism, we now have two stories that illustrate my conclusion perfectly. First is this from an Obot about what she expects from the Obamessiah:


See how crazy they've gotten? She's transferring every ounce of responsibility onto Obama. Not only is it not possible for any President to accomplish all of this stuff for any citizen, but any President who tries will inevitably fail. And, Obama apparently knows that, as he is already trying to lower the expectations of his followers:

Barack Obama’s senior advisers have drawn up plans to lower expectations for his presidency if he wins next week’s election, amid concerns that many of his euphoric supporters are harbouring unrealistic hopes of what he can achieve.

The sudden financial crisis and the prospect of a deep and painful recession have increased the urgency inside the Obama team to bring people down to earth, after a campaign in which his soaring rhetoric and promises of “hope” and “change” are now confronted with the reality of a stricken economy.

One senior adviser told The Times that the first few weeks of the transition, immediately after the election, were critical, “so there’s not a vast mood swing from exhilaration and euphoria to despair”.

Doesn't this mean that his entire campaign has been run on empty promises of hope-n-change? Hmmm...

Here's more on how Obama has become The Silencer. It's a pattern, and if it's worked well enough to put him into the White House, there's absolutely no reason to think he'll quit doing it after he gets there...

Aside from ACORN, the other way Obama is apparently trying to steal the election is through his website's continued practice of accepting illegal credit card donations. See here for the background. Their excuse has been that it would just be 'too hard' for them to screen out those fraudulent donations. While I'm not sure how pure laziness gives them a pass on breaking election law to raise money for the highest office in the land, Slate doesn't even let them away with that much:
Barack Obama refuses to release the names of the 2 million-plus people who have given his campaign less than $200. According to campaign officials, it would be too difficult and time-consuming to extract this information from its database.

So how come we were able to do it in a couple hours? Not literally—we don't have access to the campaign's list of donors—but we created a database of similar size and format in a Web-ready file and posted it online.

Of course, releasing the information would also be politically risky, since the inevitable errors in a database so huge (errors of the kind McCain also had, like a contribution from "Adorable Manabat") would give McCain an opportunity to scream fraud. Then again, he does that sometimes even without evidence.

And from a purely logistical standpoint, we have a hard time believing the campaign lacks the expertise to do this. We know the information is already in a very sophisticated database—it has to be, because the Obama campaign has been manipulating the information for more than a year as it continues to raise money from these small-fry donors. It also uses the information to contact and track donors to make sure they get out and vote on Election Day.

It can't be any clearer that Barack Obama is breaking election law in accepting illegal donations in an outright attempt to steal the election.

These are serious updates. Given that we're only three days away from the election, and given that the media is whole-heartedly covering for the Obamessiah, it is unlikely any significant action will be taken on any of these things. The only recourse we have is to spread the word to as many people as we can, show them the truth, and get every possible person to the polls. The only thing that will save this country from an Obamessiah thugocracy is a tremendous grass roots push to get an enormous turnout against His Thuggishness.

There's my two cents.

No comments: