You want a glimpse of the future that crime-coddling Eric Holder and the White House will be bringing up en masse?
Right now, in New York City, jihad scientist Aafia Siddiqui is on trial.
See here, here, here, and here for background on the MIT-trained microbiologist/suspected KSM operative who went missing after 9/11 — and was caught, shot, and extradited two years in Pakistan after threatening to kill American soldiers.
The Pakistani government is paying for part of her defense. She has used the civilian court system to shout anti-American propaganda and spew hatred against Jews, cause legal chaos, and make a mockery of the rights she has been granted. al Qaeda has been trained to game the system. The Western-educated Siddiqui is milking it for all it's worth.
On Monday, she was thrown out twice for outburts. Her defense team is now asking for, you guessed it, a mistrial.
A U.S.-trained Pakistani scientist linked to al-Qaida got into trouble again Monday in federal court after twice interrupting the sometimes tearful testimony of an American solider who claimed he shot her in self defense in Afghanistan in 2008.
"I feel sorry for you," Aafit Saddiqui blurted out at one point at her attempted murder trial in Manhattan. After a judge had deputy U.S. marshals remove her, she pointed at the witness and muttered something else before disappearing behind a side door.
U.S. District Judge Richard Berman allowed Saddiqui to return later, but kicked her out again amid another rambling tirade about injustice. At the end of the day, the defense argued that the removals made her look bad in front of the jury and asked for a mistrial, which the judge denied.
"It's highly appropriate for her to be escorted out of the courtroom when she acts out," he said.
Siddiqui – a specialist in neuroscience who trained at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Brandeis University – has insisted in previous courtroom rants that she's innocent. She also has refused to work with her defense attorneys, including some paid for by the Pakistani government.
The soldier described Siddiqui's 2008 ambush:
He testified Afghan authorities had told him Siddiqui had been restrained, and was shocked when she sudden appeared from behind a curtain wielding his M4 rifle and yelling, "Allah akbar," Arabic for "God is great."
"It was pretty amazing she got that thing up and squared off," he said. "She was looking at me and aiming dead at me."
Hearing the rifle go off, the officer said he followed his military training and pulled his pistol. Siddiqui was wrestling with an interpreter when he shot her in the stomach.
"I operated within the rules of engagement to eliminate the threat," he said.
Two jurors were also let go after a man sitting in the courtroom pointed at them, used his finger as a gun to pretend to shoot them, and mouthed an obscenity.
Reports the NYPost: " The unidentified man in a white headdress was taken into custody but it was unclear if charges were filed following the incident in Manhattan federal court."
An al Qaeda suspect given free reign with her tongue in a public courtroom. Jurors threatened. Prosecution in jeopardy.
Now, imagine the scene being repeated in 12 or 20 or 25 more courtrooms across America simultaneously with similar high-value suspects and the jihadi dregs of Gitmo.
Are you ready? It's coming.
Tuesday, January 26, 2010
And You Thought This One Was Bad...
Michelle Malkin reports on the current debacle where liberals and lawyers are trying to use the courts to punish a radical Islamic terrorist. Just...well...just read the whole thing:
Egad. This outcome was both entirely predictable and entirely preventable, and it will be worse with top-level terrorist leaders like KSM. And yet...liberals want to do it anyway. In reality, they're going to give these murderers a gigantic stage from which to try the United States in a court of global public opinion. What utter, utter, fools.
There's my two cents.