Wednesday, September 12, 2007

Top 5 9/11 Truther Myths Debunked

Sadly, there are people in this country (called 'Truthers' or, 'Troofers', as the blogosphere calls them) who are more apt to believe in crackpot conspiracy theories than the fact that radical Islamic terrorists killed 3,000 people six years ago. Mary Katharine Ham writes on Townhall.com about the top 5 myths regarding the 9/11 terrorist attacks. The theories are varied, but they all center on the fact that Bush caused/allowed it to happen and blamed the attack on radical Islamists in order to get more involved in the Middle East.

Ham writes that a recent Zogby poll revealed 42% of Democrats believed Bush either caused or allowed 9/11 to happen. 42%! She writes that "[f]or that reason, even though the real truth about 9/11 is utterly and completely obvious to the rest of us, the Truthers must be countered." So, here are the top 5 myths:

Myth #1: Four novice pilots with no experience could never have successfully guided those planes into three out of four targets.
Fact: The hijackers were not experienced pilots, nor had they ever piloted commercial airliners, but they also didn’t have to do any of the three most difficult flying maneuvers—flying in inclement weather, taking off, or landing. They had licenses and were trained in navigational systems, so all they had to do was plug in the GPS coordinates.

Myth #2: No large, steel-frame, fire-protected building had ever collapsed before due solely to fire.
Fact: Each plane was carrying thousands of pounds of jet fuel, which burns at 2,190 degrees Fahrenheit, a great deal lower than the temperature required to melt steel (2,750).

Experts and investigations conclude that steel didn’t have to melt to cause collapse. Instead, the planes entering the buildings at 750 feet per second caused significant damage. They were banked at an angle that took out multiple floors upon impact and likely stripped the fireproofing from the core load-bearing structures on those floors. Jet fuel then ignited everything inside the buildings.

Steel weakens at as low as 400 degrees. At 980, it’s at only 10 percent strength, according to industry experts. As the core steel columns weakened, load-bearing was transferred to the building’s shell. As the fires continued to burn, multiple floors weakened, sagged, and pulled on the outside structure causing total collapse.

The jet fuel followed the path of least resistance, incidentally, which means some of it flowed down the elevator shafts from the top of the building, causing explosions and fireballs on lower floors, which conspiracy theorists sometimes cite as evidence of bombs.

Myth #3: World Trade Center 7 could not possibly have collapsed due only to collateral damage sustained from the Towers’ collapse. That was controlled demolition, too.
Fact: Further investigation has found that one face of the building had damage to 10 lower stories. That damage was obscured by smoke in most photographic evidence. There are also a number of idiosyncrasies in the building’s design that contributed. It was built over a power substation, which meant the relatively few columns on the lower floors were designed to carry extremely large loads. Taking out just one would have caused serious problems. WTC 7 was designed to stay operational during power outages, so several fuel tanks for generators inside the building are thought to have supplied the fires with fuel for up to seven hours.

Myth #4: Flight 93 was shot down.
Fact: Flight 93 flew into the ground, at a steep angle, at about 580 mph, disintegrating most of the wreckage. What did remain, notably a large piece of engine fan, the Truthers claim ended up miles away from the site, indicating the plane was breaking up before impact. In fact, the fan in question landed 300 yards from the site, and other small bits of paper and scrap metal floated a mile and a half and landed in Indian Lake. Truthers claim Indian Lake is 6 miles away from the crash site, betraying investigation skills hampered by Google Maps. The lake is 1.5 miles away as the crow flies; 6 miles driving.

There was a small corporate jet in the vicinity at the time, descending toward Johnstown, Penn. when the FAA ordered it to check out the area at Shanksville. The plane descended to 1,500 feet, found a smoking hole in the ground, marked the position with the plane’s navigational equipment, and headed to the airport.

Myth #5: The Pentagon was hit with a cruise missile.
Fact: The hole in the side of the Pentagon was approximately 90 feet wide, according to The Pentagon Building Performance Report, but it was not the exact width of the 124-foot plane.

Both wings were damaged before the plane entered the building. According to eyewitness reports from commuters on I-395 and observers in the Pentagon parking lot at the time, the right wing hit a large generator and the plane clipped three light posts on its low, barreling descent.

The Pentagon, because it’s the Pentagon, is built of extremely dense reinforced concrete columns. When the plane hit them going 530 mph, it essentially disintegrated. As one observer said, the plane seemed to “melt into the building.”

Parts of the plane that did remain intact past impact flew far into the building. The heavy landing gear created a 16-foot hole in Ring C of the Pentagon, a full 6 walls beyond the entry point, and the flight data recorder was found 300 feet inside the building. Truthers contend that the 16-foot hole had to have been made by a missile.

Ham summarizes:
The people who believe these things call themselves patriots who are just "asking questions." Strangely, answering the questions never satisfies them.
Her reasoning:
The Popular Mechanics book, "Debunking 9/11 Myths" uses science and expert testimony to take on the Truthers, but when it published its initial article on the subject, the online 9/11 Truth movement went up in arms.

"In a few short weeks, ‘Popular Mechanics’ had gone from being a 10-year-old journal about science, engineering, car maintenance and home improvement, to being a pivotal player in the global conspiracy on par with Nazi germany," remarks James B. Miegs, editor of "Popular Mechanics."
Her conclusion:
The all-out Truthers will never be satisfied, but it’s incumbent upon real patriots—Democrat and Republican alike—who know the real truth about 9/11 to defend that truth with facts, lest we lose more everyday Americans to the seduction of the Truthers.

Sept. 11, 2001 was surreal. It was hard for every American to believe. That doesn’t mean we have license to ignore reality. Doing so just puts us in danger again.
Keep this in mind next year, because the Troofers will be out in force again.

There's my two cents.

No comments: